yesmovies Free Online Blade Runner 2049 Movie Site

Rating=426930 vote / / Synopsis=Thirty years after the events of Blade Runner (1982), a new Blade Runner, L.A.P.D. Officer "K" (Ryan Gosling), unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge what's left of society into chaos. K's discovery leads him on a quest to find Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former L.A.P.D. Blade Runner, who has been missing for thirty years / Year=2017 / Writer=Hampton Fancher / director=Denis Villeneuve

→✷ ⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕⁕

→✷ Server 1 Link

→✷

→✷ ✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺✺

No it didn't flopped because of run time, or its R rating, or competition, or luck. it flopped because it was simply a bad movie. none of the characters were able to elicit empathy or connect with the audience. it was just poor acting and directing. there were too many plot holes. the plot was simple. it could have been summed up in a sentence or 2. but it stretched to almost 3 hours. when will they learn that being vague does not automatically convert to suspense. i suspect that most viewers coming out of this movie will be whispering to their friends not to waste their money and 3 hours of their life, rather wait for the video release to check out the expensive visuals. i did. and that, i think, is the reason that this movie flopped this weekend.

The film was a solid six and maybe a 6.5 But why we have to have sequels that rely on big names and trying to use the things that made the first movie unique. I think was a good movie but as good as Blade Runner? Oh hell no! I'm not a big Gosselin fan but he was good in it and Harrison Ford gave one of his best performances he has had in some time. Being scifi there of course had to have a gorgeous female character, Ana de Armas more that made up for any deficiencies in any other casting weaknesses. She was absolutely captivating as was Sean Young in the original. I believe it could have been much better with some editing that could have shortened the all too long film. Much of the film was visually stunning and the sound track was good. The sound track seemed as if it was more directed to older people like me (I'm 62) Would I spend the money again to see it? Yup even at a 6.5 it was definitely worth a visit to the big screen.

• hatensatsu.localinfo.jp/posts/24080677
• https://kasenmato.themedia.jp/posts/24104089
• https://rogushinabe.localinfo.jp/posts/24110440